Employers urged to build accommodations into everyday workplace practice
Leaders say workers with cognitive, physical, and learning needs often go without support because they don't know what is available or whom to ask, and call on employers to make accommodations standard rather than something employees must request.
Many neurodivergent workers are not aware of the accommodations they are entitled to, and many do not know whom to approach to request them, according to survey figures cited by leaders advising employers on inclusion. In one survey, 70% of neurodivergent workers said they did not know what accommodations were available to them, and 60% said they did not know whom to ask. The gap, the leaders argue, is a practical problem that employers can close by changing how they handle support from the start.
The recommended starting point is disclosure. Employers should explain available accommodations during interviews, at onboarding, and throughout an employee's tenure, rather than leaving workers to discover them on their own. Leaders also urged organizations to treat adjustments as standard practice instead of requiring every employee to ask for them, a shift that can reduce the stigma of making a request and the burden of navigating an unclear process.
Several measures leaders described are designed to help everyone, not only workers with a documented need. Flexible workspaces, meeting pre-reads, and transcription tools fall into this category, as do captioned and recorded meetings, written agendas, and written follow-ups. Because these tools are broadly available, workers are less likely to feel singled out for using them, which the leaders identified as a key part of psychological safety at work.
Communication and work style were another focus. One leader described adapting how they communicated with an autistic employee, and said that employee performs well as a result. More broadly, leaders said some workers benefit from clear direction, specific responsibilities, and complete expectations. Others need flexible schedules, quiet or background-noise options, or time to process information before responding. Rather than insisting on a single working style, leaders recommended judging the quality of output instead of how closely a person conforms to a standard way of working.
The leaders also addressed policy and design. They urged employers to involve people with lived experience in workplace design from the beginning, and to treat accessibility as a core design principle rather than an afterthought. Outdated policies, they noted, often persist after the reasons for them have disappeared, and should be updated when that happens. Listening was described as essential, with one leader stressing that surveys that go unanswered do little to build trust. Employers should also be clear about what can change and what cannot, so that workers understand the limits of what is possible.
Culture and leadership came up repeatedly. Leaders said managers need to learn how individual team members work best, and that organizations should challenge assumptions about who gets to lead and how leadership is defined. Cognitive and learning differences, they noted, can bring strengths in big-picture and pattern thinking. They framed inclusion as a matter of talent development rather than only compliance, and pointed to remote work as a arrangement that has accommodated disability and chronic illness for many employees.
The leaders cited research and expertise from, 2Gether-International, and Easterseals as resources for employers seeking to build these practices. Their message was consistent: supporting diverse cognitive, physical, and learning needs requires specific, ongoing steps, from making information about accommodations easy to find to making sure asking for help does not carry a cost.
Source: fastcompany.com
3
