Gen Z Started Building Wealth at 19 but Most Say They Still Can't Get Ahead
A U.S. Bank survey of 5,000 adults finds Gen Z began building wealth at 19, 13 years earlier than boomers, yet 56% say they did everything right and still aren't where they hoped to be financially. Rising housing, tuition and vehicle costs are outpacing income gains, and employers are rethinking benefits to help.
Gen Z workers began building wealth at an average age of 19, more than a decade earlier than baby boomers, yet most say the head start has not translated into financial security, according to U.S. Bank's 2026 Wealth Survey of 5,000 U.S. adults conducted from June 15 through July 1.
The survey found that millennials started building wealth at 25, Generation X at 29 and boomers at 32, meaning Gen Z began 13 years sooner than the oldest generation in the workforce. But 56% of Gen Z respondents said they did everything «right» and still are not where they hoped to be financially, while 62% said they struggle to make financial headway.
Homeownership remains a top five-year priority for Gen Z and millennials, yet 29% of Gen Z and 26% of millennials said they have given up on owning a home for financial reasons. The traditional path of saving, buying a home and building equity no longer delivers what it once did, and that has direct implications for employers trying to attract and retain young talent.
Housing costs are a central obstacle. In 2025, the median existing single-family home sold for 4.7 times the median household income, according to Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies' State of the Nation's Housing 2026 report. That ratio was 4.1 as recently as 2019 and averaged 3.2 in the 1990s. The gap is visible in who is buying: the median age of first-time homebuyers has climbed to an all-time high of 40, according to the National Association of Realtors' 2025 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers, compared with the late 20s in the 1980s. Many young adults locked out of the housing market are putting money into the stock market instead, and some parents are funding down payments rather than college savings.
College costs have followed a similar trajectory. Published in-state tuition and fees at public four-year colleges averaged $5,940 a year in today's dollars in 1995-96 and reached $11,950 in 2025-26, roughly double, according to the College Board's Trends in College Pricing and Student Aid 2025 report. Over a similar stretch, from 1994 to 2024, median family income rose just 39% after inflation.
Transportation adds another burden. About seven in 10 U.S. workers drive alone to work, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, while the average new vehicle sold for $50,562 in September, just $52 shy of the all-time record, according to Kelley Blue Book. Used cars offer limited relief: the average used vehicle was listed at $27,239 in August, up 7% from a year earlier and the highest since December 2022, according to Cox Automotive.
Housing, education and transportation were once treated as attainable milestones. For many Gen Z workers, they now feel like luxuries reserved for earlier generations. That shift is changing how young employees evaluate job offers, with many judging a position by whether it will help them move forward financially.
Some employers are adjusting. Since 2024, the SECURE 2.0 Act has allowed employers to match employees' student loan payments with 401(k) contributions, letting workers paying down debt earn a retirement match without contributing to the plan themselves. But the traditional 401(k) match still assumes workers have money left over to contribute.
«A 401(k) match is great in theory, but a 23-year-old paying $2,400 in rent on an entry-level salary can't, through no fault of their own, afford to contribute enough to earn it, so the benefit skips the people who need it most,» Amy Spurling, founder and CEO of Compt, which runs employee stipend programs, told Fortune.
Spurling said the issue is worth remembering during open enrollment, when employees choose their benefits. «If your employees under 30 are skipping the match and ignoring the perks, that tells you something isn't working,» she said. For employers, the survey suggests that early financial starts alone are not enough to create stability, and that benefits designed around assumptions of leftover income may miss the workers who need them most.
5
